darke
Syri i Natës

Regjistruar: 24/08/2003
Vendbanimi: night
Mesazhe: 2545
|
Dreamer of silence
The dreamer, then, says that, in that solitary room, the silence would be very dense... like snow on the cloister of a monastery abandoned in the desert of another planet...
Then, the dreamer says that the atmosphere of that room could be disturbing and ghostfully, but even though, all possible sensation of disquiet would be eclipsed by the peaceful spirituality of the air. And when the dreamer is saying this, he makes a brief pause to sigh.
Subsequently, he says that beyond the window it would be the night, that beyond the night the presence of the sea should be guessed.
The dreamer remains silent during some time, but later, looking at me fixedly to my eyes, he tells me that it is very difficult to express the nature of that silence that floods his dream. The dreamer says that art is to understand what you cannot express, but that he is not an artist, but only a dreamer. I tell him that if he has been able to dream that silence, he will also be able to dream that he is an artist. The dreamer smiles.
He says that, since in the beginning it was the verb, it would be necessary to appeal to the art of the literature firstly to express that silence… the one that firstly it would be necessary to appeal to express that silence... although to express the silence with a word is a contradiction. The dreamer supposes that literature could only narrate that oniric silence with a symbol of a visual metaphor.
The dreamer says that that experiment of avant-garde court would be also literature, but that this, or at least what is expected from her, is not silence, but a scream, and that therefore, the metaphor dreamt to express the silence would be, only, a reef of the thought, an infinite ejaculation of Byzantine syllogisms...
No, the dreamer says, the art of the literature will never be able to express the silence. I tell him that what literature cannot express, the art of the music yes can do it. But the dreamer says that a music able to express the silence would be simply a madness.
The dreamer, when saying this, he keeps quiet again, but my eyes want that the dream continues. Then the dreamer says that he has just dreamt that the room had two youths. He says that he has not seen them, and much less to hear them, that he has only felt a intuition of being with two presences...
After sighing again, the dreamer says that the art of the painting could maybe to express the silence that plays his dream. He says that painting, contrary to literature, is not direct communication, but suggestion, elegance of the eloquence... That a painter could depict the silence...
The dreamer says that for that portrait the painter should leave from the technique of the watercolorists, soaking everything of water, and that later he should go covering the whole surface with successive color layers, so many layers like colors there was in his palette, until of the sum of all the colors he got the most perfect in the black ones.
The dreamer says that this portrait should be made as the love: a dark rite that culminates between two in the bigger possible communications between two beings.
These words have left in the face of the dreamer a rake of nostalgia. And suddenly he asks me that if I have seen Goya's black paintings that if I usually listen Beethoven. I answer that I have seen more Van Gogh or Bach. When these names are pronounced, the onomatopoeia of the silence has resonated in the transparency of the air and we look at ourselves, astonished.
The dreamer says again that it would be the art of the painting the one that made understand the deafening silence of his dream. He explains that each color has a sound that each sound possesses a silence that each silence takes implicit a truth...
The dreamer says that only with the sum of many silences we will obtain the knowledge of ourselves. He says that that intimacy between color and sound, between darkness and silence, among physics and metaphysical, optics and mystic, it is such a narrow intimacy that one can say that each chromatic intensity is a tonality, so much of pigment as of volume... that it is the reason, the dreamer says, for which the blind man and the deaf one are connected with a superior sensibility: both are forced to that tonality, to that volume... For them it is easy to fall in the chain of color like sound, darkness like silence, optics like mystic. That maybe they see the truth, such and like it sounds, he says.
The words of the dreamer take me toward an dreamer abstraction. And to return to that reality, the reality of the dream, I ask what color would the walls of that dreamt room be. He answers me: color gloom, because the room could only be illuminated by the dying flame of a candle. That light would be the mother of that silence that that night would have arisen of the center of that room to silence the eternal lament of the sea. And the youths, naked like the walls of the room, don't look at themselves, they don't speak to each other, they remain silent... it would be enough that each one screamed and the walls will fall down, and they could enjoy their freedom, to go out to the night and to cross the sea.
Me, with an indomitable curiosity, I ask who are those youths. He answers me the following thing.
Us. You and me, and if you still didn’t see it, we are the same being, because everybody has in theirselves two natures, the dreamer one and the realist one, the logic one and the irrational one, and only when one converses with the other one, although it is in whispers, silence breaks to rebuild ourselves.
Denonco këtë mesazh tek moderatorët | IP: e regjistruar
|